top of page
Search

Title: The $2.3 Million Mistake Most Leaders Are Making Right Now: Why succession planning isn't an HR exercise. It's a financial strategy.

  • Writer: Toby Hoy
    Toby Hoy
  • 23 hours ago
  • 6 min read

Picture this. A VP of Operations at a mid-sized manufacturing company has been with the organization for 22 years. That's not just tenure. That's institutional memory, vendor relationships, process knowledge, and shortcut awareness that no job description ever fully captures. She knows which clients need a phone call before an email. She knows which vendor will negotiate and which one won't. She knows the third-shift supervisor in Building C is the most important person nobody talks about.


On a Tuesday morning in March, she walks into the CEO's office, sets down a folder, and gives her two weeks' notice. She's accepted a dream role she couldn't pass up.

The CEO congratulates her. Genuinely. He means it. She deserves it. Then he closes his office door, sits back down at his desk, and has one thought.


'We are absolutely not ready for this.'


He's right.


The six months following were rough. Client relationships frayed. Processes existing only in her head walked out the door with her. Two promising managers resigned in frustration because the organization felt like it was making up the playbook as it went. The final estimate of productivity loss, recruiting costs, and client churn totaled $2.3 million. In six months.


Here's what stings most: none of it needed to happen. Not one dollar. Not one resignation. Not one lost client relationship. All of it was preventable with one thing the organization never bothered to build: a succession plan.

 

Why Leaders Keep Kicking the Can

Succession planning sits in a strange category of leadership work. Everyone agrees it matters. Almost nobody does it well. A 2023 Deloitte study found fewer than 14% of organizations feel confident they have enough leaders ready to fill critical roles. Nine out of ten organizations are operating on hope.


Hope is not a strategy.


There are three reasons leaders consistently avoid this work, and all three are worth naming directly.


The first is time. Development work doesn't show up on a quarterly dashboard. It doesn't generate a win you point to in this month's leadership meeting. It's long-cycle, quiet work, competing with everything feeling more urgent in the moment.


The second is that it feels a little morbid. Planning for your own replacement or for the departure of your best people puts you face-to-face with the impermanence of every role. Most leaders would rather not sit in that feeling.


The third reason is the one nobody says out loud in the conference room.

Ego.


Not arrogance. A quiet, subtle fear that even the best leaders feel: if I develop someone capable of filling my role, will I make myself obsolete?


The answer is no. The opposite is true.


The leaders who are remembered and respected long after they've moved on are not the ones who held on tightest. They're the ones who built something that didn't need them to hold it together. Their legacy is measured not by the problems they solved but by the leaders they grew.

 

The Taco Truck That Almost Lost Its Secret

Let me tell you about Toby's Taco Truck. Best tacos on wheels, full stop. The signature item is an al pastor that loyal customers drive out of their way for. The recipe lived with Destiny, the line cook there since day one. She knew the exact ratios, the timing, the technique. It was in her hands.


The owner always meant to document the recipe. He always meant to train someone else. He kept telling himself he'd get to it 'when things slowed down.' In the food truck business, things don't slow down in April. Or June. Or September.


Then Destiny got an offer from a brick-and-mortar restaurant downtown. More stability, better hours. She gave two weeks' notice. The owner was genuinely happy for her. He was also quietly terrified.


For three months, the truck served adequate tacos. Not great. Adequate. The regulars noticed immediately. Two of his best weekly accounts dropped him from their rotation. His Saturday farmers market contract, accounting for nearly 30% of weekly revenue, was not renewed.


It took eight months of trial and error and retraining a new cook to get back to where he was before Destiny left. Not because her departure was a disaster. Because he never asked the succession planning question: what happens when this person isn't here?


Scale that up to a department, a division, or an entire organization. The principle is identical. Critical knowledge living in one person's head is not an asset. It's a single point of failure.

 

The Question You're Not Asking

Here's a question worth asking yourself right now: if your most critical team member left today with zero notice, what would break?


Not 'what would be inconvenient.' What would genuinely break?


If you know the answer, you're ahead of most leaders. If you don't, go find out before you finish reading this. Walk the floor, sit in the meetings, ask the questions. Now ask a harder one. If you disappeared tomorrow, would your organization keep moving? Or would it slow down, spin out, and stop?


That's the real succession planning question. Not just for the roles below you. For yours.

 

What High-Potential Actually Looks Like

When leaders start thinking about succession, they often default to their top performers. Top performers matter enormously. But technical excellence and leadership capacity are different muscles, and developing them requires different approaches.


High-potential leaders share consistent traits across industries and organization sizes:

•       They're curious about problems beyond their immediate lane

•       They ask 'why' more than 'what.'

•       They build trust with peers, not just with leadership

•       They improve under pressure, not just when conditions are easy

•       They take accountability without being prompted


That last trait is the most underrated signal. Accountability without prompting is the clearest indicator of someone ready for more responsibility. Watch for it. When you see it, invest in it.

 

Building the Pipeline

Succession planning is not a one-time exercise. It's an ongoing process. Here's a five-step framework working across organizations of every size:


1.    Identify: Map your critical roles and current bench depth for each one. Be honest. 'We'd figure it out' is not bench depth. Name actual people.

2.    Assess: Evaluate your candidates against leadership competencies, not just technical performance. What do they do when the plan falls apart?

3.    Develop: Create intentional development experiences. Stretch assignments, cross-functional exposure, structured mentorship. Not a training catalog nobody opens.

4.    Test: Give candidates real responsibility before they fully need to carry it. Let them lead a project, present to the executive team, and make decisions with real consequences. Let them fail at something small while a safety net is still in place.

5.    Review: Build succession planning into your leadership calendar. Quarterly check-ins on development progress. Annual deep dives on role criticality and bench depth.

Step three carries the most weight. Intentional development is the difference between a succession plan that exists on paper and one that works when you need it.

 

The Conversations That Change Everything

The single most powerful thing you can do for an emerging leader is be direct with them. Tell them you see potential. Tell them you're investing in their development. Ask them what they want their career to look like in three years. These conversations feel uncomfortable the first time. Have them anyway.


Organizations that have these conversations openly see retention increase. Engagement goes up. The average quality of leadership across the organization improves. People rise to meet expectations when those expectations are clearly communicated.


One caution: development conversations work only when they're genuine. Empty promises with no follow-through destroy trust faster than saying nothing at all. If you start the conversation, follow through.

 

Your Starting Point

You don't need a 50-page succession planning document. You need to start. Here are four steps to take this week:

•       List your five most critical roles. Not the most senior. Most critical. The roles where a vacancy genuinely hurts.

•       For each role, write down one to three names who could fill it. If you can't name anyone, that's your first development priority.

•       Schedule one honest development conversation with one high-potential team member this week. Ask where they want to be in three years and what they need from you to get there.

•       Put succession planning on your leadership calendar. Quarterly reviews. Annual deep dives. Treat it like the strategic priority it is.

 

The Legacy Question

Every leader eventually leaves their role. Retirement, promotion, a new opportunity, or the passage of time. The transition will come. The question is not whether you'll leave. The question is whether you'll leave something worth inheriting.


The organizations that survive disruption, economic uncertainty, and the unpredictability of leadership transitions are the ones that built their bench before they needed it. They didn't wait for the crisis. They prepared for it.


Start today. The leaders you develop now will carry what you built long after your name stops appearing on the org chart. That's not a small thing. That's everything.


For more on leadership development and organizational strategy, visit www.toby-talks.com. The Toby Talks podcast and YouTube channel are loaded with practical frameworks to put to work right now.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


© 2025 Tobias C Hoy. All rights reserved.

bottom of page